![](https://mwanzotv.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/AFP__20240422__34PW88K__v1__HighRes__BritainRwandaMigrationPolitics-1024x683.jpg)
The British government's controversial plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda has finally been approved by Parliament earlier on Tuesday.
The move was reached after a tug-of-war that lasted until midnight between the House of Lords and the House of Commons.
Members of the upper house, which evaluates proposed legislation, returned the bill several times to the lower house but eventually agreed that the bill needed no further changes, thus protecting the bill from becoming law.
On Monday, British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak promised to start in the next few months, sending asylum seekers arriving in Rwanda to Rwanda, as a controversial program of the British government and sending asylum seekers to Rwanda.
Sending immigrants to Rwanda is an important part of Prime Minister Sunak's response to stop the actions of illegal asylum seekers in the UK.
The migrants risk their lives by using small country transport from France. The proposal to remove immigrants from England has faced controversy and challenges since former Prime Minister Boris Johnson presented it in 2022.
The number of migrants registered in the UK by small boat is set to reach 45,774 in 2022 from 299 four years ago. The migrants pay criminal gangs thousands of dollars to ferry them to England.
Last year, the number of arrivals to the small country in the country decreased to 29,437 as the government in London fought hard against the sale of the halifu and the agreement to return the Albanians to their country.
At the end of March this year, the United Nations Human Rights Committee called on the United Kingdom to abandon the controversial plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda, arguing that the agreement between the two countries did not respect the authority of the British High Court which said that the agreement between the two countries did not take into account the authority of the British Supreme Court which stated that the plan is against international law.